Dr Lansley's Brave New World?

We are now well into the convulsions caused by Andrew Lansley's radical reorganisation of the NHS in England. Already, the NHS senior management establishment is undermining much of what he set out to achieve. We were told that it was expected that there would be about 550 consortia formed. Clearly this is far too anarchic for the bureaucrats and they have fought back with dogged determination to ensure that the "new" NHS structures retains as much as is possible of the "old" NHS structures (that got us where we are today).

Now, the NHS hierarchy seem determined to create much bigger consortia than was originally envisaged. They are suggesting that in East London, the minimum size they see as sufficient to create the necessary economies of scale is about half a million patients. That is roughly the combined populations of the London Boroughs of Newham, Tower Hamlets, Hackney and The city of London. Amazingly enough (or not), that is precisely the description of the existing "cluster" formed by the amalgamation of the three PCTs last year. If you divide the poulation of England by half-a-million, that would mean about one hundred consortia for the instead of the 550 suggested by Dr A and his merry men. This is all a far cry from the original plans as they were explained to us.

Meanwhile, the PCT/Cluster seems determined to fashion things as it thinks they ought to be rather than what the commissioning groups think or want. Since it is these same PCT managers that got primary care where it is today, they’re mostly the people I would rather were NOT designing their replacement. However,  turkeys rarely vote for Christmas and here in East London, the turkeys still reign.

I now longer have either the energy or the enthusiasm to try and change things.

At a personal level, I am saddened by how little of the energy that is being expended is making any difference to patient care. Things are being rearranged, usually at some considerable cost, but rarely to make things better. We have been tricked into doing the government’s dirty work for them presiding over significant cuts in funding despite all the rubbish that ministers spout about “spending in real terms”. Primary care is 90% of the care and 10% of the funding. Giving us amateurs the budget for the other 90% whilst slashing it can only be poor value for taxpayers and poor value for patients. The answer to the problem of NHS managers that clearly can’t manage is to find managers that can, not give it to GPs who have no training or experience.

I am glad I will have retired by the time that our local general hospital announces firstly that it will have to close its A&E service (probably done in stages by first reducing opening hours), and then that it is closing most of the rest of the hospital too. For consortia, they should realise that the politicians will be quick to point out that this will be a commissioning decision so it will be their fault.

Alice in Budgetland

The NHS year runs from April to the following March. Over the past couple of years, we have been encouraged to take a greater interest in the cost of the medicines we prescribe for our patients. You might think that such interest would be a "given" but it is not so. The NHS relies on doctors to "do the right thing" when choosing which drug to prescribe. At the same time, these same doctors are the targets of the intense promotional activity by the drug companies. Busy doctors have little time to take a calm, measured look as the latest drugs on offer.

One positive move was the allocation of prescribing budgets to GP practices. The carrot has been the offer of allowing practices to keep a proportion of any savings they make providing these savings are reinvested in improving care for patients. At the moment, there is no "stick"; there are no sanctions for exceeding budgets but it is hard to believe that won't come in due course. Last year we saved £70k from our budget. We look forward to using these savings to add to our services. An in-house physiotherapist; an acupuncture clinic, and the like. Our budget this year is £1.33m. That's our share of a total budget of £32m for the PCT as a whole. We have worked hard to make further savings and at about the half-way point (the latest figures available) we have increased our savings to an annualised £130k. Great! We can continue to offer these extra services and add to them.

This week I received a letter from our PCT. They have finally incorporated the changes in payments to community pharmacies. These changes will have to be funded from this year's budget. It means that £1.8m additional funding has to be found. Thats about 5% of the total budget and it will have to come out of all our budgets.

Let me see. Five per cent of our budget is £66k. Gone! Half the savings we have worked hard to achieve. It is the end of month nine of our financial year. What is the point?